I think both types of cities have their own appeal, but modern ones often offer more variety for tourists. The main reason is that they combine entertainment, shopping and cultural experiences all in one place. Take Shanghai for example - you can visit traditional temples in the morning, then go to world-class museums in the afternoon, and end the day at rooftop bars with amazing city views. That kind of diversity is hard to find in purely historical cities. That said, places like Jiuzhaigou, which I mentioned earlier, still attract visitors precisely because they preserve something unique that modern cities can't replicate.
すべての質問
Part 3a city that you really enjoyed visiting
Are modern cities more interesting for tourists than historical ones?
バンド7.5 模範解答
他のPart 3の質問
- Are ambitious people always successful at work?
- Are animals just as intelligent as humans?
- Are body language and tone more important than words when communicating?
- Are cities that tourists like to visit also good places to live?
- Are doctors paid too much for the work they do?
- Are employees who can easily adapt to change at work more successful?
- Are governments doing enough to promote environmentally friendly transport or transportation?
- Are older people better at controlling their feelings than young people?